That ongoing assessment process led in part to the crisis in 2007. After reviewing the system, USACE reported "reduced confidence" in the levees’ ability to protect against a 100-year flood event. Based on these findings, FEMA announced that the levees no longer met federal accreditation standards, effectively reclassifying much of St. Louis' Metro East as an unprotected floodplain.
The issue was not due to neglect or a sudden deterioration of the levees but rather a shift in engineering standards and risk assessment methods. In order to meet FEMA’s accreditation requirements, USACE recommended an extensive levee system upgrade and replacement—an immense and costly endeavor projected to take decades and require an investment of hundreds of millions of dollars. The region faced a stark choice: act swiftly to restore confidence in its current flood protection system or risk significant economic and infrastructural damage.
Bridging the gap: Expertise, innovation, and trust
Recognizing the urgency of the situation, the State of Illinois and the three affected counties moved swiftly, establishing the Southwestern Illinois Flood Prevention District (FPD) Council in July 2009 to secure funding and manage the levee system’s repair and reconstruction. New legislation provided capital, but engineering expertise was essential to identify and resolve deficiencies while ensuring the levees met FEMA’s rigorous flood protection standards—on an accelerated timeline.
Restoring confidence in the levee system was no small task. It required specialized, multidisciplinary expertise to navigate complex engineering, regulatory, and logistical challenges, along with a deep understanding of FEMA and USACE regulations. Ultimately, we were awarded the project, but securing the contract was far from straightforward.
“The process of being awarded this project was multifaceted.” says Jon Omvig, Senior Vice President of WSP in the USA and Project Manager for the Southwestern Illinois levees project. “Initially we were hired (by the FPD Council) to evaluate the cost estimate developed by USACE. While the Council appreciated the work we had completed and had confidence in our preliminary analysis, they recognized that a project of this magnitude would require a competitive selection process.” What followed was a Design Competition wherein three engineering firms were invited to prepare a brief plan, schedule, and cost estimate for restoring FEMA accreditation.
After assessing the USACE cost estimate and before the design competition, we conducted a thorough levee screening against FEMA accreditation criteria. During the competition, our team prioritized maximizing the use of existing levee infrastructure to deliver both cost efficiency and the level of flood protection required by FEMA—within a reasonable budget. We also proposed an accelerated schedule that allowed construction to begin before land acquisition was complete, a calculated risk aimed at securing FEMA accreditation before the levees could be reclassified. Once selected to design the improvements, our work was directly informed by the deficiencies identified during the screening. These insights proved critical in determining the necessary fixes to meet FEMA standards.
These factors were critical in gaining the Council’s trust, but our team’s success went beyond engineering capabilities. “We had the technical expertise,” explains Omvig. “But the key to us winning this project was we understood the nuances between FEMA and the USACE and were able to bridge the gap between their similar but distinctively different regulations.”