“By learning from global best practice and applying those lessons locally, WSP can help set a new benchmark for efficiency, speed of construction and environmental responsibility in bridge design. A bridge built quickly is typically a cost-effective bridge, and reducing materials saves both cost and environmental impact, as well as reducing weight allowing smaller more standard lifting equipment and providing further cost and environmental savings”
Research undertaken by WSP’s Global Leadership Development Group confirms that girder and beam proportions and design approaches vary significantly between regions.
Josh Vize, WSP’s key research lead and research document author, outlines that some countries favour deeper, heavier sections of beam, while others achieve greater efficiency with slimmer profiles.
For example, the UK commonly uses Y-beams and U-beams, Australia typically relies on Super T girders, Canada prefers I and NU girders, and New Zealand commonly uses hollow core and Super T beams. In the United States, bulb tee sections are widely adopted for their material efficiency, along with a range of other superstructure types. Of particular note to New Zealand, the UK are starting to consider their version of the bulb-tee / NU girder, based on the sections used throughout the US but optimised for Eurocode loading and durability requirements.
These differences aren’t just about shape – they reflect decades of regional practice and priorities. Understanding these variations gives New Zealand a chance to adopt the best ideas and move towards designs that balance strength, sustainability, and economy.
Jeremy says the report provides a blueprint for more efficient, smarter, greener bridge replacements in New Zealand.